1. how has technology changed the integrity of art? if we can so easily open something, edit, or press undo if we dislike the product, does that actually take away the credibility of the artist? does it make them any less creative, or does it raise the standard by which people are deemed artistic? can someone who is not technologically advanced still be an artist?
2. is the value of an original piece destroyed by the ability to duplicate and distribute that piece across multiple media? if so, do watermarks serve as a way of preserving integrity, or do they simply obstruct the artists ability to reach the viewer by indicating a lack of trust?
No comments:
Post a Comment